Tuesday, September 30, 2008

How to SEO Flash

Historically, search engines have been unable to extract content, such as text and links, from Flash (SWF) files. Subsequently, much of the Flash-based content on the web has been unavailable in search results. This situation has been frustrating for web developers, who have tried to come up with workarounds to help get search engines to index and rank their Flash pages.

This situation hasn’t been ideal for searchers either, as this limitation has kept them from seeing potentially great matches for their queries because they’ve been locked away in Flash files.

According to Adobe and Google, all of that is changing. Google is launching what they they say is a “deep algorithmic change,” augmented by Flash reader technology supplied by Adobe, that enables them to “read” Flash files and extract text and links from it for better indexing and ranking. This could be great news for both site owners and searchers.

Google has been working on improving how they crawl and index rich content (such as Flash and JavaScript) for some time, and in fact have been able to extract some text and links from Flash files for a while. Adobe makes Google’s algorithms “less error prone” and enables them to access content created in any version of Flash in a variety of languages.

Adobe says they have developed an optimized Flash player for search engines and are collaborating with both Google and Yahoo!. Yahoo! has not yet implemented the technology, although they stated that “Yahoo! is committed to supporting webmaster needs with plans to support searchable SWF and is working with Adobe to determine the best possible implementation.” Adobe hasn’t made the technology available to Microsoft’s Live Search, although they say they are “exploring ways to make the technology more broadly available” to “help make all SWF content more easily searchable.” A quick look at how SWF files are currently indexed shows that there’s a lot of room for improvement, so this may indeed be big news for search.

Flash has often been a source of frustration for SEOs who argue that text should be in HTML, with Flash used for non-textual content, such as video illustrations. Can SEOs now remove the “review Flash implementation” line from their checklists? Probably not. However, it should be easier for SEOs to work with Flash-based sites going forward.

You should keep in mind that these new algorithms don’t take into account any meta data or formatting markup in the Flash file and, for now, Google’s cache won’t show a representation of the extracted text so site owners can’t verify what is actually being crawled by viewing the cached copy. In addition, since Googlebot doesn’t execute most JavaScript, Google won’t crawl or index any Flash executed via JavaScript. Any external sources that the Flash file loads will be indexed separately, rather than as part of the Flash file. And as noted earlier, all non-textual content will remain uncrawled. This new Flash support covers all languages other than bidirectional ones (Hebrew and Arabic) and all versions of Flash.

Labels: , ,


Google Testing Snippet Results in SERP

A WebmasterWorld thread reports Google is testing giving the users the ability to set the size of the search results snippets. Google is showing at the upper left of the search results page "Web: Result details: S M L" The "S," "M," and "L" letters are button like and they control the snippets.

S = No snippets
M = 161 character description in the snippet area
L = 638 character description in the snippet area

Here is a sample image.

Google Snippet Test

Labels: , ,


The Definition of Bounce Rate and Exit Rate

I am still getting asked by clients and collegues what the the heck is "bounce rate" and how is different from "exit rate"? I have blogged on this topic before but over the past few months, I’ve received more and more questions about these two very important metrics for your web site. It seems there is still some confusion about differences between the two, why they are important, what they tell you, and how to improve them. So, I decided to write this post to demystify them a bit.

Let’s start with some definitions. The definition of Bounce Rate is the percentage of visitors that hit your website on a given page and don’t visit any other pages on your site. For example, John views an organic search listing, clicks through to your site, and then leaves your site without visiting any other pages. He bounced.

The definition of Exit Rate is the percentage of visitors that leave your site from a given page based on the number of visits to that page (or pageviews in some cases). Sounds similar to Bounce Rate, doesn’t it? There’s a difference, though. The visitor who exits might have visited other pages on your site, but just exited on that specific page. For example, John views an organic search listing, clicks through your site, reads a blog post, then clicks the About Us link. After finding out more about your company, John clicks the contact us link and fills out a contact form. He then exits your site. The contact us page is where he exited. In contrast, if he simply visited the site via organic search and left without visiting any other page, it would have been a bounce. Make sense?

Both metrics are important and can help web marketing people glean insights from the data, but they are definitely used differently. Bounce Rate is extremely important for determining how your landing pages perform as compared to visitor expectations. For example, if you run paid search campaigns, then you know the importance of testing a landing page (optimizing the landing page). I find that bounce rate at the aggregate level doesn’t tell you very much (site level bounce rate), but I find that bounce rate at the page level is extremely useful. It actually makes a lot of sense if you think about it. For example, if you are driving paid search visitors to your landing page selling Coffee Makers, and you have a 70% Bounce Rate on that page, you’ve got a problem. Why are that many visitors bouncing after clicking through your paid search ad and landing on a page that theoretically should be highly targeted? This is actually the fun part…digging into the data, optimizing the page, and using multivariate testing to lower your bounce rate and to increase conversion. As you can see, bounce rate can help you determine how well your landing pages perform (which directly affects revenue and ROAS).

In my opinion, Exit Rate is more important for determining which page in a process isn’t performing up to expectations. For example, if you have mapped out scent trails on your site (ala Persuasion Architecture), and you find visitors are exiting the site on a webpage that clearly is a stepping stone to a more important page, then you should probably take a hard look at that page’s content. Are the calls to action not compelling enough? Does the page provide content that throws off visitors? Is there a technical issue with the page? Does it take too long to load? So on and so forth. Note, that for specific processes like cart checkout, you should use funnel analysis, but analyzing exit rate for more open ended processes works well (like targeting a type of buyer and providing a scent trail for them to get to a registration form.)

Watch this Google Channel video on Bounce Rate after reading this blog post.

Labels: , , ,


Thursday, September 18, 2008

Google conversion tracking site stats logo is now optional

Finally! Google AdWords conversion tracking users are no longer required to display the "Google Site Stats" logo on the conversion pages of their web sites.

Previously, a small but visible text block that read "Google Site Stats" automatically appeared on the page where the conversion tracking code was placed on your web site. The logo would appear only after a conversion occurred via your AdWords ad, and it provided converting visitors links to information about AdWords conversion tracking and instructions on how to block the tracking.

The logo was redundant with almost all web site privacy policys, where they already notify users about the tracking technologies in use on their sites. A

If you currently have conversion tracking tags installed on your web site, the Site Stats logo will continue to display unless you take further action. If you choose to remove the logo, please inform users about the tracking methods you employ on your site by modifying your site's privacy policy.

For those of you who are new to conversion tracking, it's a powerful tool that allows you to measure conversion metrics for your AdWords campaigns. An added benefit of using conversion tracking is that it allows you to use the Conversion Optimizer, a bidding feature that uses your conversion tracking data to optimize the performance of your campaigns, helping you make the most of your advertising dollars.

Labels: , , ,


Google Quality Index AdWords Tool Now Live

Finally, Google launched their much requested AdWords Quality Score Index Tool. Now both agencies and clients can see their First Page Bid Estimates and Inactive Ad reasons. This is a big time saver.

Google says, "....that for queries without many advertisers competing for placement, the first page bid estimate should be relatively close to your existing minimum bid. However, queries with a high level of advertiser competition may have significantly higher first page bid estimates, because you'll likely need to bid above the old minimum bid to rank higher than your competition and show on the first page. Remember that you can bid less than your first page bid estimate and still show on subsequent pages -- as long as your keyword is relevant to our users."

Advertisers familiar with the competitive landscape for their keywords will notice that the first page bid estimates provided are in line with the CPCs that they had been bidding to appear on the first page prior to the release of the new tool.

Labels: , ,


Monday, September 15, 2008

Domain Value Tips

Here are some of his tips for determining the value of a domain name:
  • Is there a keyword in it?
  • How many people search for that keyword on a regular basis?
  • Is it memorable?
  • What is the history of the domain name (number of on-topic links, level of traffic, TLD of the domain name)?
  • Does it have a hyphen in it? Domain names with hyphens are less valuable, but may be a good option for SEO purposes because the main keyword may be in the domain name. 
When deciding whether you should buy a keyword-rich domain name for your business or your newly-redesigned Web site, keep in mind that you don't have to come up with all of the cash for a domain name purchase. Several companies allow you to finance domain name purchases. For example, Domain Capital offers financing to businesses based on the "inherent and recognized value of premium domain names." So, it's possible you won't have to come up with $20,000 for a domain; you could finance the domain name purchase and pay it back over time, working in the financing cost into your marketing plan.
So, take a look around when you're looking to upgrade or redesign your Web site with a new domain name. If you don't immediately find a domain name that is available for registration, consider acquiring a "premium" domain name. It might be more affordable than you think.

Labels: , ,


MSN Live Search Announces New Ad Position

MSN has announced that beginning today, you have an extra ad placement opportunity with the addition of a fourth ad in the mainline above the organic results. (Mainline ads are the ads that appear above algorithmic results, and right-rail ads are those that appear to the right of the algorithmic result set.) With this update they are increasing the ads shown from up to 8 per page to up to 9 per page, which means there is an additional ad placement opportunity for advertisers in the adCenter auction. This also means that the top two mainline ads will continue to receive essentially a two-for-one ad placement, since they will also display at the bottom of the page in the U.S. Check out the new addition on Live Search.

Microsoft says they have made this change in response to feedback asking for more clicks for their ads. They say their test results show that displaying a fourth mainline ad, and also displaying the top two mainline ads again at the bottom of the page, increases clicks to these ads. Google and Yahoo offer a max of 3 positions on top, might they change now?

Labels: , ,